Education

Popular “America’s Army” Video Game, Recruiting Tool Cancelled

New Game Will Recruit Young Diplomats

WASHINGTON — The Department of Defense announced yesterday the cancellation of its highly successful and popular “America’s Army” online game and recruitment tool. The program has already been converted into a new game, operated by the State Department, entitled “America’s Diplomat.” State Department spokesperson Donald Demsfold called this “a pretty good step towards nurturing a generation committed to the principles of diplomacy and peaceful negotiation.”

In the discontinued “America’s Army” video game/recruiting tool, players stormed villages.

In the discontinued “America’s Army” video game/recruiting tool, players stormed villages.

America’s Army was an online game designed by the Army to attract young recruits via simulated combat missions, many of which were modeled on actual battlefields in the Middle East.

During its use as a recruitment tool, America’s Army consistently ranked among the top 20 Internet-based games. First launched in July of 2002 at a cost of $10 million dollars, America’s Army’s annual support budget was estimated at $1.5 million.

The cancellation of the game comes as part of the elimination of the Army’s entire $583 million recruiting budget.

Early versions of the game were only moderately successful with young people, but the more subtle game is expected to inspire longer-term dedication. “I’ve never experienced such an exciting simulation of international negotiations,” Greg Hauser, 14, told the press. Hauser is president of the Eastern High School debate club.

The State Department has high hopes for America’s Diplomat, given its predecessor’s highly successful history. In 2005, 40 percent of all recruits surveyed had played America’s Army game prior to enlisting. As the game’s popularity grew, and after dozens of new releases, the America’s Army brand expanded to include console and cell-phone games, T-shirts, and the Real Heroes program, a section of the America’s Army website that highlighted actual soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan, and even recreated them as action figures.

The avowed purpose of America’s Diplomat is to encourage young people to consider careers in the diplomatic corps, and to present non-military alternatives in a positive light. Where the ability to aggressively attack and kill opponents spelled success in America’s Army, America’s Diplomat stresses situations that demand negotiation, dialogue and peaceful outcomes.

Reactions from gamers have been intense as those attempting to access the America’s Army website have been redirected to the new America’s Diplomat site.

Lenny Purvill, a 16-year-old player, noted an initial disappointment in finding his favorite online game replaced. “I liked to pretend I was in the army going on missions in Iraq. And blowing stuff up was fun,” he told the press. Purvill, who has been playing the game since he was 13, had been considering signing up when he turned 18.

His initial disappointment, however, was replaced by fascination as he facilitated a peaceful negotiations between Sunni and Shiite militiamen. “It was like, are they gonna shoot each other? No! They’re not! ’Cause I’m helping them settle their differences with diplomacy. It’s so awesome,” he said.

Purvill also said he excitedly anticipates the expansion of the game in the coming months. This is expected to include new mission updates such as “United Nations,” “Peace Corps,” “Swords to Plowshares” and “Gandhi’s HungerStrike!”

Demsfold acknowledged that the game represents a major shift in focus. “The next generation of government game-playing kids may not be able to kill very well, but they’ll be able to practice diplomacy. That’s what our national security calls for.”

Defense Secretary Scott Ritter acknowledged that national security could benefit from the new game. “One of the most important lessons of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is that military success is not sufficient to win,” he noted.

Unlike its predecessor, America’s Diplomat has been pronounced suitable for children of any age by the Entertainment Software Rating Board.

America’s Diplomat is available online: americasdiplomat.com

19 Comments so far ...

1. Sarah Atwater

hey you brilliant activists, I would love to see a ‘redirect’ operation placed on web sales of the pre military conditioning which seem to be the majority theme of popular games available-much applause to you

Comment on November 13, 2008 02:50 am

[...] Tool Cancelled.” There’s even a fake NYT website to accompany the paper. You can go here and read the article, or in case the site’s owners receive a cease and desist order, [...]

Pingback on November 13, 2008 09:05 am
3. RealAmerica

This article is laughable. Liberal hippies need to wake up to realization. We didn’t gain this country through diplomacy alone. Ever heard of the American Revolution? (Oh, thats right, I’m sure England would’ve just GIVEN us America, if we complained enough- YEAH RIGHT) Diplomacy has its place, but in this world it cannot stand alone. Sorry, but that’s life.

In WWII Japan couldn’t understand diplomacy. In the end all they understood was force.

In the Middle East they don’t understand diplomacy. Violence is life. The “peace negotiations” are pointless. 100 years from now (heck, 500 years from now) we will still be seeking “peace in the Middle East”.

I’d like total world peace as much as the next guy, but the efforts are truly fruitless in the end. Human nature is the very thing that prevents world peace from happening.

Digg me down and bury this article now. Oh wait, wrong site…

Comment on November 13, 2008 09:22 am

A commendable idea although not very lucrative according to modern standards. Perhaps integration into school curriculum can aid the spread.

Comment on November 13, 2008 10:56 am
5. DZ

People just like the game and most who were reviewed about joining the army laughed.

Comment on November 13, 2008 12:45 pm
6. ThatOtherGuy

The quotes from the kids are brilliant, if you ask me.

Comment on November 13, 2008 03:59 pm

Um, the Diplomat game is rated by the official website: T, which is NOT suitable for children of all ages.

What happened to “speak softly, but carry a big stick”? there is still a need for the US military, and their will be as long as Americans have freedoms to defend. I suppose once the NYT’s Global Socialism Union led by the UN comes to fruition, there will be no need for freedom fighters to defend freedoms.

If the America this newspaper presents comes to pass, it will be the end of this republic.

Comment on November 14, 2008 01:45 pm

Also, the website for the game is not official in anyway, but was created by someone after the NYT created the concept for this spoof game. It is not an official government website.

Comment on November 14, 2008 01:48 pm
9. Flaming Liberal

This is the best site everrrrrrrzzzzz!!!! omg omg. wow u guys r the best!

Comment on November 14, 2008 07:17 pm
10. Jacob Egelburger

This is a joke. Garggee Boooosh is the best prime minister ever you guys r deluslional. Get a life losers and stop wasting your time making stupid comments on this page. Honestly.

Comment on November 14, 2008 07:20 pm
11. jane powell

ROFL!!

Comment on November 18, 2008 12:05 pm
12. ron jonson

You do realize we need an army.

Comment on November 23, 2008 08:46 pm
13. John Smith (not quite really)

Really?
I totally for got why is it that we need an army…
I obviously disagree with armies, however if there is a real need for an army the money to support it shouldn’t affect the more plausible need for education, health, homes,…
Everything has a cost you say, well, don’t make things free just make them acquirable.
Wait, wait, I just remembered, the army was to invade other countries! right!

Comment on January 10, 2009 03:37 pm
14. MaDMicK

WoW this unbelievable. You think stopping a game that you had so many people excited and waiting for is going to bring “Peace” to the world? All it is going to do is kill the game and people will just go to the store and replace it. And to think simple shallow minds suck as these are running our country. AA3 iwas going to be what AA0 SF was “Entertainment”. A place to go and relive the day to day stress instead of going to the bar. Leave it to the Gov to mess up and ruin something a simple as FREE ENTERTAINMENT… What they are really saying is The New Prez is cutting back salary and spending in the white house and now the same people can’t make there 100k house payments so they are cutting into or taking away any program or resource that wont be noticed so they can gain the money they are losing. Blah what was I thinking to think the government would usually do what they said……….

Comment on May 16, 2009 12:12 am
15. MaDMicK

Owww and to all the LIB’S trying to stick up for these Morons should go hug a tree and leave the real issues to the men…

Comment on May 16, 2009 12:15 am
16. AnonUser13521

NOT THAT WAS ONE HELL OF A PORK BARREL PROJECT!

Comment on June 25, 2009 10:04 am
17. wut

You’re all retarded.

Comment on November 23, 2009 01:18 am
18. Dave

OMFG people are retarded.
Go find a dictionary and look up “Satire”.

Comment on November 23, 2009 01:38 am
19. danae

The thing I find interesting is that despite the cries of many comments the article speaks about making sure there are functional diplomats as well as armies. It is safe to assume that there are more than enough games which “train” in military areas, so why not let the government “train” functional diplomats? Like many of you said… we need both.

And as many of you pointed out by complaining about various political points of view, I’d say you agree that we need more people to be interested in politics to represent your point of view.

Lastly.. as one astute person pointed out. It’s very unlikely that actual careers are coming out of these games… they are GAMES. Sure, they have an influence but not as much as some people claim and not as little as others do. They place information in the players grasp and it’s up to them what to do with it.

Okay.. I guess really lastly.. the quotes in here sound hilariously fake and I repeatedly had to check the webaddress to make sure I wasn’t reading an Onion article.

Comment on June 27, 2010 04:49 pm
(required)
(will not be published) (required)
(opitional)